Prince Harry’s Trial Over Tabloid Invasion of Privacy Casts Doubt on Deleted Evidence

Prince Harry has won a high-profile trial against the British tabloid system MGN, but suspicions of deleted evidence have resurfaced. In the trial, Harry sued MGN for illegally collecting information and invading his privacy by hacking into his personal phone. Despite winning the trial and receiving compensation, there are concerns that Harry may have deleted evidence related to the case.

In response to these allegations, Harry’s lawyer has argued that they are baseless and that Harry has provided all necessary evidence to the court. However, the High Court ruled that Harry must disclose drafts of his book and messages related to its writing, even if they were deleted after the lawsuit was filed in 2019. The judge expressed concern about the deleted documents and ordered efforts to recover them.

The court also instructed Harry’s legal team to request communication records from the royal household, further investigating the allegations of deleted evidence. Initially, Harry filed the lawsuit in 2019, claiming to have been a target of illegal information gathering for 15 years by the newspaper system. The court confirmed his claims and ruled in his favor in January.

However, despite winning the trial, new developments have emerged with suspicions of deleted evidence coming to light once again. The legal battle between Prince Harry and MGN continues as new evidence is uncovered.

In conclusion, despite winning a high-profile trial against British tabloid system MGN over illegal collection of information and invasion of privacy through hacking into his personal phone, Prince Harry’s victory has not put an end to suspicions regarding deleted evidence related to his memoir “Spare.” The legal battle continues as new developments emerge with new evidence coming into light.